MAF sensor mods
Greg Hermann
bearbvd at cmn.net
Fri Mar 30 04:07:03 GMT 2001
At 7:41 PM 3/30/97, Hash wrote:
>Seems that everyone prefers the MAP systems to the MAF. I was wondering if
>anyone has taken the MAF and enlarged the size of its case, or put it in a
>larger tube, or cut out the fins inside to increase airflow.
Or try running it with a second, similar sized, sensor free port which is
closed off by a butterfly at low throttle openings. Use software that
doubles the MAF reading when the butterfly is open.
Sort of analogous to the way the secondaries work on a four barrel carby.
Greg
I have a
>650cfm holley on my car now and thats fine for my 350, so as long as I got
>650cfm from that MAF wouldn't it be alright? I purchased the MAF system
>before reading as much as I have now about the two systems, but it seems
>like a MAF system could be modified like the MAP for a performance system...
>
>Or am I just trying to justify my purchase? :)
>
>Afshin Salehi
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
More information about the Gmecm
mailing list