[Gmecm] The next step: E67 ECM

[Scott Peitzsch]

Nope - not at all likely to have been "backwards engineered".

Me thinks the more likely method was "backdoor engineered".

As in - documentation made its way out the back door!<g>

-Scott

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "WopOnTour" <wopontour at hotmail.com>
To: <gmecm at diy-efi.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 4:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Gmecm] The next step: E67 ECM


> Since almost ALL aspects of the E67 calibration can currently be 
> altered/modified via HP Tuners, doesn't this mean that the decompiled 
> calibration and OS data must be floating around out there in cyber-space 
> somewhere?
> This was so obviously NOT something that was "backwards engineered"...
> WOT
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <bcroe at juno.com>
> To: <gmecm at diy-efi.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 10:56 PM
> Subject: [Gmecm] The next step: E67 ECM
> 
> 
>>I suppose there is no physical access to the computer
>> (data & memory) buses.  If there were, equipment could
>> pick up the actual code.
>>
>> 20 Jun 07  "Darren Freed" <darrenfreed at gmail.com> writes:
>>> Nevertheless it would be very interesting to look at
>>> the code and compare various configurations.
>>>
>>> HPTuners is fine if all you want to do is adjust parameters
>>> in the calibration data.  If you really want to understand the
>>> PCM, it is useless, because the file generated by a read
>>> of the pcm is encrypted - very annoying.