[Gmecm] The next step: E67 ECM

[WopOnTour]

LOL
My thoughts EXACTLY Scott!
WOT

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Peitzsch" <jlg-sep at comcast.net>
To: <gmecm at diy-efi.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Gmecm] The next step: E67 ECM


> Nope - not at all likely to have been "backwards engineered".
>
> Me thinks the more likely method was "backdoor engineered".
>
> As in - documentation made its way out the back door!<g>
>
> -Scott
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "WopOnTour" <wopontour at hotmail.com>
> To: <gmecm at diy-efi.org>
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 4:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gmecm] The next step: E67 ECM
>
>
>> Since almost ALL aspects of the E67 calibration can currently be 
>> altered/modified via HP Tuners, doesn't this mean that the decompiled 
>> calibration and OS data must be floating around out there in cyber-space 
>> somewhere?
>> This was so obviously NOT something that was "backwards engineered"...
>> WOT
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: <bcroe at juno.com>
>> To: <gmecm at diy-efi.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 10:56 PM
>> Subject: [Gmecm] The next step: E67 ECM
>>
>>
>>>I suppose there is no physical access to the computer
>>> (data & memory) buses.  If there were, equipment could
>>> pick up the actual code.
>>>
>>> 20 Jun 07  "Darren Freed" <darrenfreed at gmail.com> writes:
>>>> Nevertheless it would be very interesting to look at
>>>> the code and compare various configurations.
>>>>
>>>> HPTuners is fine if all you want to do is adjust parameters
>>>> in the calibration data.  If you really want to understand the
>>>> PCM, it is useless, because the file generated by a read
>>>> of the pcm is encrypted - very annoying.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gmecm mailing list
> Gmecm at diy-efi.org
> Subscribe: http://lists.diy-efi.org/mailman/listinfo/gmecm
> Main WWW page: http://www.diy-efi.org/gmecm
>