<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>will it work well for large injectors at
idle(40.7#@39psi) on a 350/350 overcammed.( my curiosity may be getting the
better of me). not sure yet if emissions are an issue..kinda depends on how it
gets titled.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I understand that above 3000rpm I wouldn't be able
to tell the difference between sfi and batch. If however the circuitry is
relatively inexpensive..why not? I believe the caddy(olds) distibutor would be
fairly easy to adapt a cranksensor to(it has an extra 'speed' sensor
location).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>Swayze<BR><A
href="mailto:mswayze@truswood.com">mswayze@truswood.com</A><BR><A
href="mailto:kswayze@bellsouth.net">kswayze@bellsouth.net</A></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A href="mailto:nacelp@bright.net" title=nacelp@bright.net>nacelp</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A href="mailto:gmecm@DIY-EFI.ORG"
title=gmecm@DIY-EFI.ORG>gmecm@DIY-EFI.ORG</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, February 28, 2000 10:38
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: curious about sfi</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="MS Sans Serif">Might work for idle, but how are you going to
hande 80% duty cycles. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="MS Sans Serif">Other then for large injectors at idle, and
some min emission stuff, why bother (asked rhetorically, been covered
before)?.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="MS Sans Serif">Grumpy</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A href="mailto:mswayze@truswood.com" title=mswayze@truswood.com>Mike
Swayze</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A href="mailto:GMECM@DIY-EFI.ORG"
title=GMECM@DIY-EFI.ORG>GMECM</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, February 28, 2000 9:23
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> curious about sfi</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>this may be dangerous thinking
but;</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>since I will probably need to install an
injector driver anyway</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>would it be possible using the pulse from the
'727 injector driver circuit in the ECM to control a 'black box' SFI
injector circuit synched using a crank sensor. I had read that the old
volkswagon FI was static at 15deg B4 the intake opening. what I am curious
about is "multiplexing?" the pulse from the existing driver and "synching"
it with the crankshaft sensor. would some of the DIS circuitry be able to do
this?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>anybody out there been dere,done
dat?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Swayze<BR><A
href="mailto:mswayze@truswood.com">mswayze@truswood.com</A><BR><A
href="mailto:kswayze@bellsouth.net">kswayze@bellsouth.net</A></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>