<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>This may sound like a stupid idea, but what if I
was to put a set of SVO 24 or 30# injectors in a 305 TPI MAF? They're cheap, and
it would offer me peace of mind (kind of like the new harness did). Could they
be tamed to work well in a 305? </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The rationale is to replace the existing suspect
injectors while planning (budgetarily) for future larger-displacement
applications. What kind of issues am I likely to run into? <FONT face=Arial
size=2>Obviously, the FI sizing params will need to be spec'd out. S-Ware mods
are within grasp. There may be more fundamental issues though,
right?</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I'm guessing there may be some problems with the
pulse width correction requirements at small-width ranges, because the larger
injectors will be open for a much shorter duration particularly at idle. Thus,
the effect of delays and such opening/closing may become more significant and
require compensation. Perhaps as the pulse width becomes quite small at idle
(like 500RPM 305 would ask for), the fuel delivery would become inconsistent as
a result of the predominant open-close time. There has been discussion here
recently on related issues, so I wanted to feed from your experiences if
possible.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Since I'm considering this near-term, I wanted to
place it before the group for comment and judgement. All answers
welcomed.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML>