<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I have done some searching through the archives
that I can find on the list (Feb 99-Jan 00, if a solution has been found after
that I wouldn't know so sorry if this has been beaten to death) and have seen
some interest and a failed attemp at getting a HEI bin working with a DIS. The
signal to the ecm from the module seems to be the culprit and the other problem
is what hardware to use.</FONT><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The signal problem was supposedly taken care of by
one person using some type of inverter. However, it was never stated what was
done. The HEI provides a short high reference pulse to the ecm while the DIS
sends a long high pulse. I hope this is correct as I may be saying the opposite
of what is true. Tinkering with the bin netted a running engine but not a
working ecm spark table. The DIS would stay in base timing. It has
something to do with the reference pulse being 60* advanced to the ecm. My
thought for a fix is this: build a disc that doesn't trigger the module until
later (actually I think earlier; I'm still confused) making the reference signal
like that of the HEI. This would mean that the disc would have short
valleys and long peaks as opposed to the original crank reluctor that has
quick square peaks like were replicated by welding bolts to a
pulley. Now, would this work or would this mess up the module's signal so
badly that it would render it useless as a trigger for the coils and as a signal
to the ECM? </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Next is the hardware issue. The only two V8 DIS
that I know of are Northstar/Aurora and the LT5. I happen to have a Northstar
DIS in front of me that was pirated from an engine swap at work. After looking
at the wiring diagram, it shows that it has two crank sensors and a cam sensor.
Also from reading the archive, I have noted that 4 or 6 cylinder engines use
a reluctor ring that has 60* reference points with TDC being marked by a
second reference only 10* apart for a total of 7 ref. points per rev. The 4 cyl.
fires every 3 pulses and the 6 every other pulse. I am *assuming* the Caddy has
the same thing except for the 7th signal, and has the two crank sensors spaced
30* from each other going into the same module giving it 12 ref. points for
one rev. and the cam sensor for TDC. The module outputs the same signals to the
ecm as a regular DIS would except that it also outputs a 24X signal, a 4X
signal, and a cam hi signal. This is why I think the reluctor is still spaced at
60* for a V8 even though 45* would be logical. If this is the case, this
may be a little awkard to adapt to a car never equipped so. The cam
sensor being the key as you would have to do something with the dist.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The other option was to use two 4 cyl. DIS
modules and coils. This might work quite well and I believe Ford uses
something like this on their 4.6L cars. You need two crank sensors and
one reluctor referenced just like a 4 or 6 cyl. except that the second sensor
would be 90* apart. At TDC, one coil pack would fire #1. Then at 90* later,
the other coil pack would fire #8, and they fire every three refence pulses. In
other words, two DIS units working as 4 cyl units just that one is firing 90*
from #1 cyl. TDC and thinks it is #1 cyl. This is just like the Caddy in that it
sees 12 pulses per rev (for both modules, each sees 6) but it needs no
cam ref. The ecm signal is the one I don't know will work. I don't know if
both modules will need to send a signal in order to work or would one signal be
enough? If they do, would a diode in the line take care of any interference?
Would the ecm freak out with these two pulses.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Someone was working on adapting a system to their V
twin bike and they made a reluctor that they have been testing on a bench. They
were able to get a spark from the module, although I don't remember if it was
ecm timed. Would you care to comment on how the project is coming and what
do you think of my rookie findings?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Let me apologize now for beating a dead
horse....again. Please, take into consideration that I am only trying to help as
I see there is interest (at least there was a year and a half ago) in
accomplishing a V8 DIS with GM equipment as others have shown interest in the
past. Yes, Electromotive and others have something already but what's the fun or
frugality in that? I also understand that a HEI dist. will work well enough but
so does the carb and fully mechanical dist. that's presently on my car. If I'm
going to swap to EFI and be silly, I might as well be real silly and try and
make the DIS work! </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>One last thing, could anyone tell me if the full
archives are available anywhere? I can only find the experimental 99-00
one.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hector<BR>78 Regal...EFI is coming<BR>435 rwhp, 419
rwtq<BR>stock 305 with 400 HP of N2O...yes, I'm kidding!<BR><A
href="http://soflaspeed.freeservers.com">http://soflaspeed.freeservers.com</A><BR></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>