<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2652.35">
<TITLE>RE: WOT open loop/closed loop</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Not running a WB in car yet, only on a dyno WB so far.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>I plan on the DIY-WB with maybe a hardware offset device if possible (after tonights talk.)</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-Christian</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Bruce [<A HREF="mailto:nacelp@bright.net">mailto:nacelp@bright.net</A>] </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2000 7:48 PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: gmecm@diy-efi.org</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: Re: WOT open loop/closed loop</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>RE: WOT open loop/closed loop</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Which system are you using?</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Bruce</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>From: cmillard@crutchfield.com</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: RE: WOT open loop/closed loop</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Once calibrated with a wideband on a dyno and found reliable I would use it for personal WOT tuning after major engine configuration changes, but running a WB all the time may not be cost effective if their lifetime is similar to a regular O2 sensor on a LT1. Just my thoughts, -Christian</FONT></P>
</BODY>
</HTML>