<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2652.35">
<TITLE>RE: WOT open loop/closed loop</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Once calibrated with a wideband on a dyno and found reliable I would use it for personal WOT tuning after major engine configuration changes, but running a WB all the time may not be cost effective if their lifetime is similar to a regular O2 sensor on a LT1.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Just my thoughts,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>-Christian</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: bcroe@juno.com [<A HREF="mailto:bcroe@juno.com">mailto:bcroe@juno.com</A>] </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 6:20 PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: gmecm@diy-efi.org</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: WOT open loop/closed loop</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>The original problem was no device could close the </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>loop on WOT. Now that we have WB, the issue is do</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>you trust the health of your engine to it? Bruce Roe</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 09:36:46 -0400 Ron Schroeder <rjs@bnl.gov> writes:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Hi,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Why is WOT open loop? Wouldn't it be better to be closed loop or is </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> feedback response an issue?</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Ron Schroeder</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>----------------------------------------------------------------------------</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes) in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org</FONT></P>
</BODY>
</HTML>