AFR control
Eric Elliott
eric_e at ix.netcom.com
Tue Jun 18 16:31:27 GMT 1996
Hello,
Having read so much mail about wanting a linear exhaust gas sensor, I
considered how to do with what we have. Could be an original thought or
maybe this is in a book I havent read yet, but here goes....
Maybe the HEGO could be used at stoich to get the correct non-stoich
AFR.
Given:
We need accurate air/fuel ratio (AFR) control over a wide range of
AFRs.
The HEGO is accurate only at stoich.
Accurate direct linear AFR measurement is expensive and shortlived.
Volumetric efficiency varies wildly with RPM, throttle opening,
weather, temperature, etc.
Engines cant sustain operation at high load and stoich AFR.
Maybe:
Starting with conservative (rich) fuel fuel table values, the 332 could
determine in a few power cycles the injection duration needed to get
stoich (get a useable stoich output from the HEGO), then return to the
conservative (rich) fuel fuel table value. Desired AFR could then be
calculated from the stoich value, and the original fuel table value
altered.
Restated, the engine could, at a given RPM & load, be switched to
operation at near stoich for a few cycles, then returned to safe rich
operation. After a few trials, stoich operation could be measured via
the HEGO, then accurate calculation of the desired fueling could be
done.
In economy cruise this could be easy and risk free. At max effort, to
avoid engine damage, the 332 would have to severely limit consecutive
cycles near stoich.
If the stoich determination is done on a cylinder by cylinder basis,
the momentary (V8) power deviation would be much less than a 6% power
loss at worst. At the same time, individual cylinder & injector
matching data could be collected. Arbitrary open loop fuel table values
could be replaced by ideal values without extensive dynamometer time.
The 332 could always be refining the fuel table values.
Is this a workable AFR control procedure?
Eric
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list