Message not deliverable

[Administrator]

Thanks for the help John. I would much appreaciate it, if you could tell me
if the two ECMs you mentioned have the same types of connectors on them. It
would also be a blessing if the majority of the pins (power, ground, and
common sensors) are common to each ECM. Or maybe I would come out better
asking for that pot of gold under the rainbow.

Thanks for the help,
GMD


At 10:35 PM 4/1/97 -0500, you wrote:
>George,
>
>The 3.8L to 3.0L conversion should be fairly easy; however they DON'T use
>the same ECM. The 3.8L SFI engine uses the 1227148, and the 3.0L MFI uses
>the 1227153 ECM. The main difference between these ECM's is PROBABLY the
>fact that the 148 has six injector drivers, while the 153 will have only
>two. My guess is that you will need the 1227153 ECM to make it come out
>right. Let us know how it works out.
>
>                John Spears
> Speartech Fuel Injection Systems
>
>>From: "George M. Dailey" <gmd at tecinfo.com>
>>Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 06:50:55 -0600 (CST)
>>Subject: MPI and sequential injection
>>
>>Question: A friend has a '86 oldsmobile royal with a 3.8L (sequential
>>injection, I think). He blew the motor and purchased a 3.0L '86 olds or
>>buick engine instead, by mistake. Were all 3.8L engines sequential for this
>>year and were all 3.0L just PFI?
>>
>>Did they use the same ECM, just different proms?
>>
>>The 3.0 has a combination sensor only while the 3.8 had a cranck and a cam
>>sensor. From the the schematics I've seen, it should be easy to make the
>>3.0L work with just a few wiring changes and a prom change. 
>>
>>Correct me if im wrong.
>>
>>Oh, by the way, he accidentally installed the 3.0 also. A "jack leg"
>>technician tried to feild modify the wiring harnes to accept the 3.0 sensor
>>with no success. He simply cut and spliced the colors that seemed to match
>>the closest :()
>>
>>thanks,
>>GMD
>
>
>


Return-Path: <owner-diy_efi-outgoing at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu>
Received: from gatekeeper.ray.com (gatekeeper.ray.com [138.125.160.10])
          by rdnetms1.eo.ray.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
      id UAA29858 for <barry_bridgman at ccmail.eo.ray.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 20:26:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: (mailer at localhost) by gatekeeper.ray.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA28083 for <barry_bridgman at ccmail.eo.ray.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 20:26:37 -0500
Received: from coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu by gatekeeper.ray.com; Wed Apr  2 20:25:01 1997
Received: by coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
    for diy_efi-outgoing id AAA05080; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 00:25:21 GMT
Received: from mars.tecinfo.com by coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu via ESMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
    for <diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu> id TAA05075; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 19:25:18 -0500
Received: from LOCALNAME (d24.t1.tecinfo.com [206.30.166.216]) by mars.tecinfo.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id SAA07425 for <diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu>; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 18:24:13 -0600 (CST)
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 18:24:13 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <199704030024.SAA07425 at mars.tecinfo.com>
X-Sender: gmd at mail.tecinfo.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
To: diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu
From: "George M. Dailey" <gmd at tecinfo.com>
Subject: RE: MPI and sequential injection
Sender: owner-diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu