Electronic Boost Control
avos at cochlear.com.au
avos at cochlear.com.au
Fri Apr 4 04:30:13 GMT 1997
A standard wastegate has a spring which will set it's response to a
given signal pressure. If the wastegate input pressure line is
connected to manifold pressure, the wastegate will open an amount
directly proportional to the manifold pressure. The amount that it
opens depends on the tension of the spring (which holds the wastegate
flap). I guess that it would be possible for the actual wastegate
opening to be not directly proportional to the pressure if the spring
is non-linear, and/or if limits are applied to the movement of the
flap.
The problem with this system is that the wastegate starts to open well
before the set boost level is reached (as it always opens an amount
proportional to the boost level), so at low boost levels when you are
hoping to get every ounce of boost into the manifold, it can be
inefficient. Naturally at high boost levels where you have boost to
burn, it makes no difference.
In a electronic boost control, PID control can be used so that the
Integral term delays the opening of the wastegate, so that it is kept
closed until later on the boost curve, so you get more boost when you
need it most.
Unfortunately I am not an expert on these things, and most of my
information is based on reading books/mags, but I hope that most of
this information is correct.
Adrian
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Electronic Boost Control
Author: diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu at INTERNET
Date: 04/4/97 13:31
avos at cochlear.com.au wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I am a new comer to this mailing list, and I'm not 100% sure that the
> information which I am after is applicable, but I'll tell you anyway.
>
> I own a 1992 Subaru Liberty (or Legacy) RS Turbo, for which I wish to
> add an electronic boost controller. The advantage of such a system is
> improved boost curve through the use of a PID control system instead
> of the current proportinal pnuematic bleed control system so better
> bottom end performance, and more accurate control of boost than the
> current system which due to its dependance on the flow of gases, can
> vary alot with temperature.
<good stuff removed>
> Adrian
Maybe I'm confused, but do you plan to improve the bottom-end
performance? If the waste gate is closed, how can an electronic
control improve things?
je
jengel at fastlane.net
"I can resist anything but temptation"
Mark Twain
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list