Too good to let go by, Part II

[Terry Martin]

Joe Boucher wrote:

> Funny you should mention radio waves.  I have a brochure for a device that
> sends ultrasonic sound into the manifold via the pcv valve tubing that
> furthur atomizes the fuel droplets.

And you just mentioned why TPI is more efficient than TBI. The fuel
"droplets" have differing mass according to size. That means the more
massive "fuel droplets" can fall out of the manifold stream before the
lighter less energetic ones. TPI delivers more of the fuel charge to the
cylinder in a more efficiently controlled manner. Any efficiency gains
are there-fore related to TPI improvements in market feasible engines. I
would readily agree that if you came out with a "cold fusion" engine
within market restraints, you will be richer than Bill Gates, ( and
probably using his technology).

There is no organic fuel engine which is as efficient as the current
version of TPI and other injected systems. That is not to say there
can't be, just that any improvement is likely to be with-in current
technological limits. And that does not include space beams from Mars.