MAP, more

[Fred Miranda]

Wayne,
I guess the sensor you use depends on what you are doing and how much you are 
screwing with electronics.

Simplest and cheapest has got to be the GM. It's made to take the heat and
the packaging
is done for you. You can also pick them up at a junk yard for a couple bucks.

If you're building some electronics, you could put a Motorola sensor right
on the board.
You also have more choices.

I started out using GM 3bar sensors with my datalogger, now I've got a situation
where 3bar isn't enough and will probably go with a 50psi Motorola.

Fred
 
At 07:39 AM 8/11/97 -0400, you wrote:
>To: DIY     --INTERNET DIY
>
>From: Wayne Strasser (CED Polymer Development)
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subject: MAP, more
>
>I sent a note out about a week ago, but no one has responded yet.  There
>are misc. notes floating around:
>
>1.  Seth wrote to Denis this past weekend about how to find a Motorola MAP
>2.  Fred wrote to someone about a GM MAPon August 8th
>3.  Someone (named A70Duster???) wrote on July 26th all about GM MAP
>volts output vs. absolute P.
>
>Can someone suggest why I would want a Motorola versus a GM or why not??
>What are the advantages of one over the other?  I need only vacuum
>sensing capabilities, vibrational noise resistance, and minimal power
>consumption.
>
>Thanks.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>        Wayne Strasser
>        wstrass at eastman.com
>
>