DIY_EFI Digest V2 #197
Harper, Kevin
kharper3 at skw1.lmsw.lmco.com
Thu Jun 12 15:56:47 GMT 1997
>----------
>From: dzorde at geocities.com[SMTP:dzorde at geocities.com]
>Sent: Thursday, June 12, 1997 7:19 AM
>To: diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu
>Subject: RE: DIY_EFI Digest V2 #197
>
>They still build the power machines in Australia. Get the new GMH HSV GTR,
>stroked 305 to produce a 217kw 350 engine, get the optional APS supercharger
>kit fitted and you have a 307kw engine with massive torque straight from the
>factory line.
>
>Now if only they could squeeze a set of turbos under the bonnet as well.
>
>Dan dzorde at geocities.com
>
>>The engines talltom is talking about are the big blocks. While they
>>are not as common as they once were, it is not at all unusual for a
>>port injected big block to turn 750 hp and 650 ft pounds. Does this
>>qualilfy?
>>
>>On the other hand, how common were 300+ HP small blocks in the '70s
>>(almost all of them, now, are in the area of 300 hp).
>>
>>----------
>>From: cloud at peaches.ph.utexas.edu[SMTP:cloud at peaches.ph.utexas.edu]
>>Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 1997 9:52 AM
>>To: diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu
>>Subject: RE: DIY_EFI Digest V2 #197
>>
>>talltom wrote
>>>Reguarding that Cloud following Tom around, I've heard that Ford
>>retarded
>>>all their cams 8 degrees across all models in 72, and that may paly
>>>a part in the ford Hp ratings, although all mfg. hps dropped in that
>>era.
>>>Tom also sez that hp ratings have come back up on the late models to
>>>higher levels than early 70's . My question is where????? Show me
>>>all the 375-450 hp ratings today, never mind 550 ft.lb at 3000 rpm.
>>
>>dang, I took my book home .... I guess you'll just have
>>to trust me 8-) (what I said was, I thought, is they have
>>come back *close* or *near* or something like that)
>>
>>Tom Cloud <cloud at peaches.ph.utexas.edu>
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list