Hi everybody., new to this group ! *** THANKS !!!! ***

[xxalexx at ix.netcom.com]

> To:            diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
> Priority:      Normal
> Date:          Thu, 22 Jan 1998 22:27:54 MST
> From:          Will Honea <whonea at codenet.net>
> Subject:       Re: Hi everybody., new to this group ! *** THANKS !!!! ***
> Reply-to:      diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu

> ** Reply to note from Riddler <riddler at cyberus.ca> Thu, 22 Jan 1998 18:34:43 -0500
> > Sorry for my lack of knowledge here but what is an Harvard Archetecture !? and why we have to
> > "fight",.. is it so bad !?!? 
> > 
> 
> Harvard Arch. machines separate data and program memory - the 8051 is a pain to work with from that
> standpoint.  It also has a very limited stack which is not real good in multi-input systems.  Speed-wise,
> the 68HCxx series runs rings around it.  There is also a bit of bias here: I've never been impressed
> (positively, at least) by Intel's power consumption/disapation nor by their electrical ruggedness, at least
> when compared to Motorola or NSC with their extensive MIL lines.
> 
> Will Honea 
> whonea at codenet.net
> 
> 
> 
How about the dallas 40 MHz 8051?.
I use  PICS with RISC architecture 5 MIPS at 20MHz. with 25 mA high 
voltage  ports. Development systems are the lowest cost.
Alex