E.T. w/ Diacom

[TBK]

I looked at running time and then counted the frames between "minute"
changes. That's what I came up with.

TK
-----Original Message-----
From: WAYNE JOHNSON <flying.monkey at juno.com>
To: diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu <diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
Date: Friday, July 10, 1998 5:35 AM
Subject: Re: E.T. w/ Diacom


>
>On Thu, 9 Jul 1998 18:48:07 -0700 "TBK" <terryk at foothill.net> writes:
>>59 frames/seconds I think. I but believe it is not linear or
>>consistent.
>>
>>TK
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: WAYNE JOHNSON <flying.monkey at juno.com>
>>To: diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu
>><diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu>
>>Date: Thursday, July 09, 1998 8:42 AM
>>Subject: E.T. w/ Diacom
>>
>>
>>>G'day,
>>>
>>>Would it be possible to calculate the elapse time (using Diacom) of a
>>>recorded run based on the number of frames?  Say, beginning when the
>>TPS
>>>shows a change and ending when a certain rpm or mph is attained.
>>Would
>>>the number of frames be dependent on the particular ECM?
>>>
>>>P.S. I'm linking in "high speed" mode (165 ECM) with the frame option
>>set
>>>to 1.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Wayne Johnson
>
>TK,
>Thanks for the reply, I just thought it would be a neat way to verify
>performance improvements.
>Cheers,
>Wayne J
>
>_____________________________________________________________________
>You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
>Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
>Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
>