had enought of crap

[garfield at pilgrimhouse.com]

On Sun, 14 Jun 1998 00:05:39 +0400, nluker <nluker at one.net.au> wrote:

>how do i get off this list !
>If you are jugded by your own conduct then you are also
>judged by the conduct of the company you keep
>Having just read the gar wars i want off
>Some one said his conduct was pardonable because of his usefullness
>Well have you ever wondered why some of the worlds most hidious
>dictators prosper for so long?
>Its because of this type of morality i.e. we know he's bad but he's
>usefull
>If your not going to drop him off then please drop me off

OH, I AGREE with you Unlooker. I DO. Any body of men should be governed
by what they consider "right", rather than just what/who's
useful/expedient. Seriously, I DO. Course, I DO understand ALSO that our
senses of "morality" are probably about exactly opposite, but hey,
whatever! See, we can still AGREE on the principles! Heh.

Frankly I don't think a person should be tolerated if they're presumed
to know sumpthin, and WON'T give it up on demand. And I SURE don't think
a person should be tolerated if they're threatened with legal blackmail
if they don't "supply", and then they SCREAM at the top of their lungs
about the attempt. Geez, what a disgusting disturbance, eh? Yup, see I
agree with you completely. Especially when they suggest that everyone
else has a stake in such a threat. Whada maroon, eh?

Finally, anyone whose language or attitude offends the women and
children, is OBVIOUSLY an abuser and perpetrator of the worst sort, and
should be STOPPED! I agree; a veritable HITLER, this person! Oh yeah!

Look, I'll tell ya what, I feel so bad about your feeling so bad, that,
well, lemme just slit my wrists while I'm typing here, and save you from
having to quit the list "on moral principles". You're obviously the
sensitive sort, and God knows we need more of your sort to make the
world right.

Garfield (bleeding as we speak)