No Subject

[Rich Mauruschat]

>From: "Matthew B. Watts" <mwatts at facility.cs.utah.edu>
>Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 02:50:55 -0600
>Subject: Re: PC's and EFI

>>- -----Original Message-----
>>From: Raymond C Drouillard <cosmic.ray at juno.com>

>What you really need is a controller that can keep the engine
>running by itself at some particular setting without anything but
>some initial values.  Then as the throttle changes, load changes,
>et cetra, the computer outputs new data to compensate for the
>changes.  The computer then becomes the error corrector, and
>the faster it is able to provide new data, the more responsive the
>engine becomes, up to some point where it is truely real-time and
>able to provide immediate compensation for every sensor it is
>monitoring.

>>The real trick is to not require the microprocessor to actually fire
>>something at a specific time.  It should calculate when and how much,
>>then load that data to something else.

Doesn't this sound just like Silicon System's demised 67F687 chip ???????
What a great shame none of the big players picked this one up, would have
saved us all a heap of sweat.

Rich.