Boingers

[Danny Barrett]

I don't blame you! Who wouldn't want an engine which can rev up to 14000 RPM
safely, with good efficiency (with the possible exception of oil co's for
the decrease in oil used).


>I am amazed that someone who is obviously not stupid should bad mouth
>the wankle rotary engine.. It is quite simply the proper design for an
>engine.  Yea alright the design is flawed due to the problem with the
>seals wearing, but in this day and age with ceramic technology there
>must be a way to make this problem go away.  I have always wanted a car
>engine that revs to 14,000 rpm with good efficiency.
>
>But thats my problem
>
>Rob Humphris
>
>>----------
>>From: 	Frederic Breitwieser[SMTP:frederic.breitwieser at xephic.dynip.com]
>>Sent: 	05 May 1998 05:44
>>To: 	diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu
>>Subject: 	Boingers
>>
>>>Anyway, just wanted to put a slant on things.
>>
>>Okay Michael, short and sweet- my apologies for not including the wankel in
>>my suggestive list of inefficient antiquated technology :)
>>
>><smile>
>>
>>
>>Frederic Breitwieser
>>Bridgeport, CT 06606
>>
>>Homebrew Automotive Website:
>>http://www.xephic.dynip.com/
>>
>>1993 Supercharged Lincoln Continental
>>1989 HMMWV
>>2000 Buick-Powered Mid-Engined Sports Car
>>
>>-
>>
>
>