Injector Duty Monitor

[Greg Hermann]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Greg Hermann <bearbvd at sni.net>
>To: diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu <diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
>Date: Tuesday, January 05, 1999 10:49 PM
>Subject: Re: Injector Duty Monitor
>
>Nope, think ya need another cup of coffee, the PW is just more accurate.
>One less computation/average.  If your doing a point by point comparasion
>the pw is more accurate, IMHO
>Bruce
>
>
>>>> Subject: Injector Duty Monitor
>>>>
>>>> On this subject, what is it that we really want to
>>>> measure? Duty cycle or the pulse width?
>>>>
>>Duty cycle relates to horsepower, pulsewidth to torque--which do you wanna
>>know??
>>
>>Regards, Greg
>>
>>What for more coffe--to pour on Doc??

Duty cycle=fuel per unit time, which relates to work per unit time, which
is what horsepower is.

Pulse Width = fuel per revolution, which relates to work per revolution,
which comes down to torque.

Where am I wrong here??

Regards, Greg