Fw: Haltech E6GM

[paul]

----------
> From: paul <gem at alphalink.com.au>
> To: diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
> Subject: Re: Haltech E6GM
> Date: Saturday, January 16, 1999 10:05 PM
> 
> Hi All,
>          The reason I am selling the haltech e6gm is that I bought
another
> race car ,from a guy called Doug robson whos name appears in the archive
> files.
> Doug if you read this contact me.......
> My wife won't let me keep two race cars so I am selling bits and pieces
and
> or the whole car. the E6gm price is about AUS$1000 .A loom and sensors
> could be supplied at a price.p.s only used on Sundays.
> PAUL
> 
> ----------
> > From: Robert E. Yorke <yorker at deltanet.com>
> > To: diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
> > Subject: Re: Haltech E6GM
> > Date: Saturday, January 16, 1999 5:31 PM
> > 
> > Paul:
> > 
> > If you found it to be so user friendly, why do you want to sell it?  At
> any
> > rate, what is your asking price?
> > 
> > 
> > At 03:10 PM 1/16/1999 +1100, you wrote:
> > >Hi There,
> > >             Maybe I can Help.I own a Haltech E6GM and an Autronic SMC
> > >unit.
> > >The E6GM has 22 fuel ranges every 500rpm up to 10500rpm or 17 fuel
> ranges 
> > >every 1000rpm up to 16000rpm and 32 load points per range.
> > > These are the same for spark and fuel which gives a very precise
> > >adjustment.
> > >this is also interpolated to work out smaller increments.
> > >This system is definately much more user friendly than the Autronic
> system.
> > >Another great feature is the data logging but the laptop must be
plugged
> in
> > >for recording the info.I hope this info has been useful.
> > >P.S    my E6GM ecm is for sale but I live in Australia so someone else
> out
> > >there may be interested.
> > >PAUL.
> > >----------
> > >> From: Charles Brooks <cbrooks1 at mail.tqci.net>
> > >> To: diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
> > >> Subject: Re: Haltech E6GM
> > >> Date: Saturday, January 16, 1999 12:22 PM
> > >> 
> > >> Is the E6GM capable of 500 RPM resolution? It's hard to tell
> > >> from the Haltech page, and the post in the archives didn't
> > >> elaborate. If so then I don't see any problem for my
> > >> application. Hhmm, seems like I'm trying to talk myself into
> > >> the Haltech unit, A 500 dollar difference is a persuasive
> > >> argument  :)
> > >> 
> > >> Charles Brooks
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> Bruce Plecan wrote:
> > >> >  
> > >> > 1,000 rpm for a 12,000 rpm capacity calibration, 500 rpm
resolution
> for
> > >a
> > >> > 6,000 rpm calibation.  Meaning no correction over 6,000 rpm not
> > >> > that the ecm wouldn't work at higher speeds.
> > >> > Bruce
> >