DFI info

[Bruce Plecan]

-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Brooks <cbrooks1 at mail.tqci.net>
To: diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu <diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
Date: Monday, January 18, 1999 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: DFI info

I got my data by reading the archives here.
Bruce


>Well, mostly because that's what was recommended to me. Can you point
>me toward some literature that compares the two? I'd like to see an
>unbiased comparison but I've been unable to dig one up. I assumed
>(Along with the advice I was given) that going sequential reduced
>fuel consumption and emissions while improving idle quality and
>performance all by a good margin. Is this wrong, or exagerated?
>
>Charles Brooks
>
>
>
>Bruce Plecan wrote:
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Charles Brooks <cbrooks1 at mail.tqci.net>
>> To: diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu <diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
>> Date: Monday, January 18, 1999 10:23 AM
>> Subject: Re: DFI info
>>
>> Why SEFI?.  From what I've read other than a slight improvement in idle,
>> light cruise emissions there doesn't seem to be any real gains with it.
>> Bruce
>>
>