Cubic Dollars

EFISYSTEMS at aol.com EFISYSTEMS at aol.com
Wed Jan 27 07:45:48 GMT 1999


Hi All,
       Yes,  exactly, in Calif. the judge instructs the jurors and if they
agree together that someone is right or wrong the judge can overturn it by
matter of "law" ..............it's disgusting.
-Carl Summers


In a message dated 1/26/99 1:27:23 PM Pacific Standard Time, goflo at pacbell.net
writes:

<< Subj:	 Re: Cubic Dollars
 Date:	1/26/99 1:27:23 PM Pacific Standard Time
 From:	goflo at pacbell.net
 Sender:	owner-diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
 Reply-to:	diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
 To:	diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
 
 FWIW, "jury nullification" is explicitly recognized in California's
 constitution. Nonetheless, the common practice is for judges to ask 
 prospective jurors if they will follow the instructions of the court
 in matters of law. Those who refuse to agree to this are not allowed
 to serve.
 
 Jack
 
 Greg Hermann wrote:
 > Yep--and remember that John Adams (yes, that one) argued that the Bill of
 > Rights was unnecessary cuz "NO JURY WOULD EVER CONVICT ANYBODY UNDER AN
 > UNREASONABLE, UNJUST LAW, ANYWAY!"  Jury nullification was an accepted part
 > of English (and thus American, unless you are from Louisiana) law from when
 > the Magna Carta was signed until the Rockefellers, Carnegies, Mellons,
 > Morgans, Harrimans, etc. told the gummint that it should henceforth be
 > called "JURY LAWLESSNESS!!" The framers considered the jury of peers to be
 > the ultimate check and balance in their newly designed system of
 > government. Really, the law on this subject has NOT changed, they just try
 > to tell us that it has!!! Jurors have the right to judge the law as well as
 > the facts in any case before them! Think about it!!
 
 
  >>



More information about the Diy_efi mailing list