Turbo'd s.b. chev...in a 69 Camaro? maybe?

[Todd....!!]

Makes sense to me....

Personally, I'd rather have the 'lag' and more power as well as less
thermal stress on the engine than the alternative...

In dragracing, if runnin an automatic, turbo lag is not an issue, due to
power braking prior to launching at the startin line gettin rid of the
initial lag....

Cool?

LATER!

Todd....!!

soren wrote:
> 
> ---
> >Matter of fact, I wonder if ANY big car manufacturer even offers any
> >cars which are turbo equipped without an intercooler?
> >
> >Anyone?
> 
>     Probably not right now, but recently (recent in the timeline of
> automotive technology, I think mostly the 1980s) Chrysler, Mitsubishi,
> Subaru, Buick, are the ones I have personally seen that have no stock
> intercooler.  And they did know about intercoolers then, evidently those
> particular models didn't require them.  I suppose that the masses who are
> used to naturally aspirated performance might rather have a low-boost,
> low-lag system where the turbo pushes air through about one foot of intake
> piping instead of 6 ft.
> 
> Soren