alternative engines, now Hemi

[Todd....!!]

Thanks for those numbers man!

Where'd you pick the numbers up at?

Well that's PLENTY of power!

I'd rather have HP than lightness....

I believe this due ot the following logic....:

If you remove 100 lbs. of weight from a car, the e.t.'s will drop by .1

If you add only 10 hp the e.t. will drop .1 seconds as well!

Does this agree with ya'll's pallete's or is something in err with my
logic?

LATER!

Todd....!!

CLsnyder wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Todd....!! <atc347 at c-com.net>
> To: <diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 1999 12:45 PM
> Subject: Re: alternative engines, now Hemi
> 
> > I hear ya talkin rap,
> >
> > All VERY good real world advice and points!
> >
> > BUT, the LOOKS of the HEMI are AWESOME!
> >
> > How many HP do ya think are possible outaof a 392?
> >
> > What was the torque and hp from the factory?
> 
> 390 hp at 5400 stock with solid lifters and dual quads.
> 375 at 5200 stock dual quad and hydraulic cam.(300c)
> 325 at 4600 single quad hydraulic.
> >
> > I don't even know the bore n stroke of teh sucker, but those HEADS ARE
> > HUGE MAN!!
> >
> 4" bore, 3.9 stroke.