SV: DFI vs TEC II

[Ola Marvik]

Va d no du ville meg??



----- Original Message ----- 
From: Frederic Breitwieser <frederic at xephic.dynip.com>
To: <diy_efi at esl.eng.ohio-state.edu>; <diy_efi at esl2.eng.ohio-state.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 1999 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: DFI vs TEC II


> >types of software available, such as MAP, MAF.  However, by time you pay
> >for the software license, the TEC II seems to be more expensive.
> 
> Actually I did in fact reply to your message... however I just built a new
> server because the old one foobar'd, therefore maybe it didn't make it
> through successfully.
> 
> I have a fair amount of experience with Haltach and TecII, and for a forced
> induction engine, its a mere toss-up.  The one major, major advantage of the
> TEC-II is that its an under-hood bolt together system that uses OEM sensors
> (or Electromotive sensors - same thing) using spade connectors.  The TEC
> units have screw terminals everywhere, and you can interface this to your
> engine very easily.  Go to the junkyard, buy sensors, and take the wires
> going to said sensors and cut them as far back as you can.  Reduces the
> price significantly actually.  The software is very expensive, however it is
> as flexible as you can imagine.  Boost, no boost, MAP/MAF, etc, and you can
> change your configuration very easily as you add one or two turbochargers
> <grin>.
> 
> I think compared between the two, the TEC II is the leader.  Bolt it to your
> firewall, and its done.
> 
> 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from diy_efi, send "unsubscribe diy_efi" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org