BasicX Microcontroller
Roger Heflin
rah at horizon.hit.net
Tue Mar 21 19:37:13 GMT 2000
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, MysticZ wrote:
> Does anyone have any experience with the BasicX microcontroller? It
> looks like the idea came from a Basic Stamp, but the thing seems to be
> way cooler. 32 I/O lines, extremely fast, ability to add lots and lots
> of addressable memory, and (maybe best of all) it's cheaper than the
> stamp. Here's the url:
>
> http://www.basicx.com/
>
> I just ordered a Stamp to play with and see what it'll do, but I think I
> need to order one of these to mess around with. Since it'll do parallel
> tasks it may be just the thing for my project. If I can fit all the code
> into 512k they can even burn it onto the chip before shipping. If I read
> all this right it means the digital instrument panel, fuel injection,
> and maybe even data logging will be possible with a single chip.
That is 512 Bytes, not Kbytes. And probably they won't burn things
into the chip for quanity 1, or probably even quanity 100, they will
want a big quanity before they go to the trouble of burning it in for
your (without charging a large amount to do it per chip).
It does look somewhat useful for some tasks. The basicx-1 does not
appear to have any A/D convertors, you need the -24 to get that.
Roger
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from diy_efi, send "unsubscribe diy_efi" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list