Fuel Atomisation
Arnaud Westenberg
arnaud at wanadoo.nl
Sun Dec 9 19:02:24 GMT 2001
Greg Hermann wrote:
>> So what you are saying is that carbs (I guess not all) have better
>> atomisation than port injection? and consequently lower BSFC? (As a
>> generalised statement - feel free to go into much detail).
> Squirting fuel on the back side of a closed intake valve (as some
> port injectors do) so as to vaporize it (to make up for the lack of
> good atomization) hurts both volumetric AND thermal efficiency.
> The trick here is to have as much of the _vaporization_ (as opposed
> to atomization) take place _after_ the intake valve has _closed_ .
I don't get it. How come the atomized fuel from the carb doesn't
evaporate until it is in the cylinder, but that from a (port) injector
evaporates at the valve? Can't be just from the higher fuel temp in the
injector case, or is it?
___
Arnaud
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from diy_efi, send "unsubscribe diy_efi" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list