Atomisation

[Bruce]

But:
Does complexity always equal better?.
Or are you talking about, all these locations while you experiment to see
what really works?.
Have you thought of how you'll balance all of these?.
You can't start an injector at 0, there will be jump in AFR when it first
turns on.  How will you synch others off, as more come on, or are you going
to try and blend the two?.
How much time are you going to budget for trying to sort this all out?.
Just playing devils advocate
Bruce



From: <bill.shurvinton at nokia.com>
Subject: RE: Atomisation
> I thought you would say that. Mind you remote injector mounts are fairly
> cheap, even for bought units (jenvey dynamics).
> So my engine, in first iteration will end up with 9 injector mounts.
> 2 in the TB
> 4 at the end of the runners (effectively port injectors)
> 2 squirting into the trumpets
> 1 squirting into the air box (worked for lotus)
> I think a good nights sleep is required, followed by looking up the
> prices for 1000cc/min P&H injectors.

> From: ext Bruce [mailto:nacelp at bright.net]
> Subject: Re: Atomisation
> From: <bill.shurvinton at nokia.com>
> Subject: RE: Atomisation
> > As a matter of interest have you ever tried remote injectors where, at
> > high RPM you squirt into the trumpet. Requires a little more finesse
> in programming I would guess but should give great atomisation up at the
> > high end
> > Bill
> I'll give you this:
> I played with webers, and for a time one tuning aid was moving the carb
> around. ie, long vs short runners with a corresponding change in air
> horn
> lenght.   Again some theories just fall apart for what you'd think would
> make sense.  The only real way to test things like this, is building a
> rig where you can EXPERIMENT, and see what really works.
> Bruce


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from diy_efi, send "unsubscribe diy_efi" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org