Maximum Piston Speed

Leon Rathburn mos68x at yahoo.com
Wed Dec 19 22:14:14 GMT 2001


I am not an expert on this, but I have heard of several benefits from water
injection to that purpose. I believe that the water jacket would gain you
that extra life and extra performance that you are looking for. However,
depending on the amount wyou may want to put in, you would have to adjust
the pocketing of the heads and the thickness of the head gasket so that you
can keep your goal of 8.0:1 compression. I know that the water will increase
compression a little, however how much I'm not sure about. The water
injection would also help to decrease your intake charge, which will
probably balance out the increase in pressure via the lack of compression
from the water, and the cooling effect on the charge decreasing it's volume.
To answer the other parts, I can't help you there, I own a Mitsubishi Mirage
with a 1.8L, no where near close to the size engine that you have there.
Hope this helps,
Leon
----- Original Message -----
From: "yahoo" <dhunt16 at yahoo.com>
To: <diy_efi at diy-efi.org>; <diy-turbo at yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:59 PM
Subject: Maximum Piston Speed


>
> Maybe someone can help.  I'm looking at turbocharging a small block
> Chevrolet.  The problem is which block do I use?  I considered using a 400
> cu. in. small block, but am having second thoughts.  The 400 cu. in. has a
> 3.75" stroke and the 350 has a 3.5" (more or less) stroke.  I had planed
to
> limit RPM to about 6500 RPM.  But now I'm wondering if that number isn't
> very much too high for the 400 small block with a turbo.
>
> I've tried to find some material on piston ring sealing, as I think that
is
> the primary problem with high piston speed on US designed engines.  As it
> turns out the maximum piston speed is at the same point that maximum
torque
> is being transferred to the crankshaft.  Since I'm interested in stroker
> engines that will have 100,000 mile lifetimes, I think that piston speed
is
> a particular problem.  For example, a 3.5" stroke engine that has been
> stroked to 3.75" has a maximum piston speed increase of 7%.  All other
> things being equal that is a HUGE increase.
>
> However the moment of inertia for the engine has been increased by the
> square of the ratios (3.75^/3.5^2) which is 13%.  Actually, there should
be
> more metal in the larger crankshaft since there is less overlap from main
> journal to rod journal which exacerbates the moment of inertia effect.  It
> seems that with a high ratio rearend (so that the primary load at high
> transmission ratios is engine inertia) will be adversely affected.  In my
> case, I'm more interested in a stump puller (boat actually) and would
> consider the high ratio first gear a pain in the !@#$ most of the time,
but
> need it when pulling up the boat ramp.  Since I'm not a racer, I don't
> consider this important, but included it in the discussion for the sake of
> completeness.
>
> Here's the question.  Under high loads (turbocharged) what are the maximum
> piston speeds that are associated with long life?
>
> Is there a need to provide extra fuel when under high load to 'save' the
> rings?  Maybe the real question is whether detonation is the only effect
of
> high power that kills the rings?
>
> Does a long rod help with piston skirt wear?  Do they hurt? Is the offset
> different with a long rod piston or does all pistons assume the 5.7" rod
and
> ignore the long term effects?
>
> I've heard that all pistons for 6" rods are built with NO offset because
> most folks don't want the performance hit, and don't care about longevity.
> I'm considering using a long rod and a 400 cu. in. piston with big pocket
> heads (and a thick head gasket) to attain the piston offset.  The target
> compression ratio is 8.0:1
>
> Are there bigger fish to fry?  That is - ring speed the least of my
trouble?
> I once heard that because of gas action behind the ring, the ring actually
> seals better under higher load.  Does anyone know with certainty?
>
> Can I save the rings on a stroker by giving more fuel?
>
> dh
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ----- End of forwarded message from owner-diy_efi at diy-efi.org -----
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> To unsubscribe from diy_efi, send "unsubscribe diy_efi" (without the
quotes)
> in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

----- End of forwarded message from owner-diy_efi at diy-efi.org -----
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from diy_efi, send "unsubscribe diy_efi" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org



More information about the Diy_efi mailing list