[Diy_efi] Early Gasoline Fuel Injection

[Mike]

Yes you're right they were diesels but quite an advanced design
in that they injected the full fuel qty but cycled the cylinders
so they kept hotter to allow them to throttle up much faster
then the british boats trying to catch em,

rgds

mike

At 03:35 PM 4/8/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>I don't know, but I thought all their U boats used diesels, the
> "original" fuel injected (but not gasoline) engine.   The  
>descriptions I have seen of several models only mentioned 
>2 to 6 diesel engines.  Show me the documentation.  Good 
>thing for us they didn't have the newly developed Kettering 2 
>cycle turbocharged diesel, used in locomotives worldwide 
>to this day.  
>
>On Mon, 05 Aug 2002 02:00:53 Mike <erazmus at iinet.net.au> writes:
>> Wasn't it also used on German 'U' boats along with sequenced
>> full load cylinder cycling, double ended headless bores
>> and water injection - around 1941 ?
>> 
>> EFI was mostly feasible due to power transistors - not to
>> microprocessors (although they help a great deal with precision),
>
>Power germanium transistors were on the scene by the end of 
>the 50s.  I had some interesting experiences on several projects 
>trying to keep them running under heat, they were very temp 
>sensitive.  We used to put dry ice at the blower input of a data 
>logging unit so they wouldn't hang up before the end of our 
>logging session.  Similarly, germanium was pretty hard to 
>use in an analog computer, being so temp sensitive.  With 
>the word "practical" in force, no EFI systems were ever fielded 
>in USA using germanium.
>
>> There are a few analog only EFI systems, the analog processing
>> could have been done shortly after the first germanium
>> transistors
>
>Analog processing of any significant complexity (say, like a 76 
>Cadillac EFI) could in theory be done by discrete transistors, 
>preferably silicon.  But blowing each of the 1976 $.50 integrated 
>circuits (about a dozen) into 100 descrete parts kind of invokes 
>the practical limitation thing again.
>
>> - but it was only due to driver transistors which could operate 
>> solenoids at any sort of rate (and cost) before EFI controllers 
>> started to become really viable - 
>
>Power transistor certainly are a great compliment to ICs.  But 
>drive transistors, even the silicon ones, were on the scene first.
>Despite that, EFI in USA awaited practical ICs.
>
>Bruce Roe
>
>> micros are a sensible and logical progression from perspective 
>> of implementing algorithmic complexity etc,
>> 
>> rgds
>> 
>> mike
>
>_______________________________________________
>Diy_efi mailing list
>Diy_efi at diy-efi.org
>http://www.diy-efi.org/mailman/listinfo/diy_efi
>
>

_______________________________________________
Diy_efi mailing list
Diy_efi at diy-efi.org
http://www.diy-efi.org/mailman/listinfo/diy_efi