[Diy_efi] Fixed frequency PWM batch mode FI
Les Dittert
lesd at earthlink.net
Tue Aug 27 02:49:43 GMT 2002
I was the one thinking of using non rpm related injection. I am using a
MAF
so I don't think the rpm *has* to come into the equation , since I don't
need to
extrapolate air flow from rpm as is done on speed density systems.
I am still concerned with beat frequencies between the rpm and injection
rate, so I will probably go with a crank
trigger and do a batch injection once per rev.
-Les
-----Original Message-----
From: diy_efi-admin at diy-efi.org [mailto:diy_efi-admin at diy-efi.org] On
Behalf Of bcroe at juno.com
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:51 AM
To: diy_efi at diy-efi.org
Subject: [Diy_efi] Fixed frequency PWM batch mode FI
On Sat, 24 Aug 2002 06:36:07 -0400 Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren at snet.net>
writes:
> With AFR constant PW is exactly proportional to torque or at least
> has been for the last 12 years I have done them..
> dave
That is true when the injection pulse is triggered by crank
rotation. So number of (constant width) pulses increases
with rpm, at constant torque.
If you fix the pulse frequency, the above statements no
longer apply. If rotation does not control how many pulses
occur, then rpm will have to be a multiplier in determining
pulse width. This could be made to work, but I don't see
the advantage.
The method described by Ron is quite straight forward.
Bruce Roe
_______________________________________________
Diy_efi mailing list
Diy_efi at diy-efi.org
http://www.diy-efi.org/mailman/listinfo/diy_efi
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list