WB vrs NB info

[Bruce]

If you want the particulars of what I quote, you can start with reading the
archives.  Search using, Wide Band, and Frank Parker for openers.   I've
done my homework, and verified what what I've said, I have better things to
do then try to remember if it was 50mv. or some bit of trivia.  Besides,
lots of this is years old, and is history.

Blowing anyone off, would be ignoring them, or letting inaccurate info.,
stand uncorrected.
If you want to split hairs, then like I mentioned you can do it all over
again, in your application, and see what the truth is in your application.
If you/or anyone, want to repeat things in several different applications,
or have friends duplicate your efforts then you can make more generalized
statements, but to do testing in one car and make sweeping statements, just
isn't correct at anytime, in my book.  If anyone wants to make mentin of
something that works for them, then that is something else entirely.  the
list is to large of cross section of varing levels of experience to Assume
much.  A newbie that hasn't even read the archives, might mistakenly take
some questionable info., as fact, and that is not something I take lightly.
The list is read by more folks the just a few involved in a thread.
Bruce




From: "Brian L Massey" <blocklm at juno.com>
Subject: Re: WB vrs NB info
> On Fri, 14 Aug 1998 00:16:54 -0400 "Bruce" <nacelp at bright.net> writes:
> > The trick is for having valid info., all the time.
> > Watching some of the NB stuff vary as a function of EGT is
> > interesting.
> > Back pressure from one application to another can skew the readings.

> OK, both of those parameters may be very important. EGT and exhaust
> pressure. Instead of dismissing one or the other, I would *REALLY* like
> to understand how these two very important params affect both NB and WB
> sensors. Instead of saying just "these can skew readings", why don't we
> try to quantify the effects? Bruce, do you have any *data* that
> correlates pressure or temps with WB (or NB) readings? So it can be
> useful to mention these things, instead of just dismissing someone that
> brings these things up?

> OTOH, I understand that if you are of the opinion that trying to quantify
> these effects is not worth the trouble, then ok.
> Like you said, "the trick is having valid info all the time". How else
> are we going to get this "valid info" without sharing our data and
> experiences? Lets give each person a chance to share their input instead
> of blowing them off so abruptly. OK? Tnx.
> Brian

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org