The quest for more speed....

David A. Cooley n5xmt at bellsouth.net
Sun Jun 27 13:11:35 GMT 1999


At 06:19 AM 6/27/99 -0400, you wrote:

>Overhead as in added systems not previously tied in to the ecm?   If

yep...  performs more functions

>an ecm were pulled from a vehicle with HVAC, cruise, and instrument
>panel tied in, and installed in a car with none of these added
>systems, would it be a valid goal to reduce the unnecessary code?  Do
>you think it would result in any gains?

I think you'd be in the same boat as adding a faster clock to an older
CPU... the timing of the routines would be messed up by eliminating code...
most of the code I have seen is written to loop in a certain number of ms.
you remove sections of code and you'd have to drop in delay routines to
take their place or you'd be shooting yourself in the foot.
===========================================================
           David Cooley N5XMT           Internet: N5XMT at bellsouth.net
     Packet: N5XMT at KQ4LO.#INT.NC.USA.NA   T.A.P.R. Member #7068
   Sponges grow in the ocean... Wonder how deep it would be if they didn't?!
===========================================================



More information about the Gmecm mailing list