BCC 3067 axxc / disassembly

[TK]

Must of the data being in decimal is annoying. Yes, it looks like they are
using GM code as a reference or they are piecing sections of other code
together. A few errors, but pretty dang good work either way.

Terry Kelley

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Sharpe <twsharpe at mtco.com>
To: gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu <gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
Date: Saturday, May 15, 1999 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: BCC 3067 axxc / disassembly


>  I can disassemble and reassemble most HC11 Bin files   someone needs to
add the
>comments and chanje the generated labels to readable names... Lots of work
but can
>do...  Pick a generic 350ci
>
>jgwynne at mrcday.com wrote:
>
>>    In message <19990514194538.12850.rocketmail at web120.yahoomail.com>, you
write
>> :
>>
>> | What is wrong with the dissaseblies given by ECMguy?
>> | Those seem to be very complete, and possibly from GM??
>>
>> Well... syntax errors, the is no way you could pipe it into an
>> assembler and get code out. Many comments, while being generally
>> correct, have the details wrong (aldl commands structures wrong, min
>> and and max limit values reversed elsewhere,...). The branch error in
>> the VATS section also comes to mind, but I don't have the anht bin to
>> check against. Commented descriptions for some of the data bits are
missing.
>> I would not be too surprised if it did come from GM, but hacked so as not
>> to too closely resemble the original. 90+% of the work is in that
>> code, but I want something more complete and capable of being modified
>> and recompiled.
>>
>> john gwynne
>
>
>
>
>