Intro to microcontrollers (long)
Bruce Plecan
nacelp at bright.net
Thu May 27 03:57:31 GMT 1999
What, you've done is outstanding in my book, but, for the average Hotrod is
way round the bend. To say I'm not jealous is a lie. But, how actually
nessecary is it?.
Cool, yes, trick, yes.
Grumpy
| > What I tell everyone is that the program is not really of importance.
The
| > tables are the important part. Even the most rabid of us GM ECM hackers
| > don't change the program code, only the data tables. It's interesting to
see
| > how GM goes about using the data in the program, but it's easy to get
side
| > tracked on the program.
| > Data tables. Layout, inter-relationship, etc.
| > Terry Kelley
| I must be seriously rabid then. I have so far changed the code in 3
| major ways. I adjusted some of the way the int's and blm's worked on
| my ECM. On mine when the BLM was adjusted the int was not adjusted,
| I changed things so that when the BLM was adjusted the int was changed
| by an appropiate amount to maintain constant mixture. This has
| appeared to make the car run better with the VE being off since the
| fuel mixture gets to the right point much faster with less
| oscillation.
| I also rigged the fuel curves to be per gear, I don't know if that has
| actually helped any performance, and I added some code to lock the TCC
| at the top of second gear (and unlock it at the bottom of 3rd).
| So far adding code was not that hard. I have only had 1 revision of
| code that actually caused the computer to watchdog reset, and since
| then I have been much more careful checking things.
| Roger
More information about the Gmecm
mailing list