Processor in 730

[Mike Rolica]

Arrrggg that is what I mean. Not a direct match, That is why I read the
archives,  Did not mean I asked the list!!  I only asked them on what the
differences were and if he had found anymore anyways, I've concluded that it
would be cheaper to go to the yard and pick one up instead of buying one.  I
mainly wanted to know if they were similar then would the software ie
compilers/dissasemblers ect work on a 165/730  from the f1   So do they?
Mike Rolica
EXT. 260
 :-)


	-----Original Message-----
	From:	Pat Ford [SMTP:pford at qnx.com]
	Sent:	Tuesday, November 09, 1999 2:31 PM
	To:	gm ecm mailing list
	Subject:	RE: Processor in 730

	 read back further I asked and Ludis said that it's close but the f1
has more 
	inside ( timer unit, adc...) the the one on a 730 doesn't

	Previously, you (Mike Rolica) wrote:
	{ Ummm read the like archives dude,  I asked the same question about
a week
	{ ago seems to be the f1   although it is not a direct match
68hc11f1-730/165
	{ Mike Rolica
	{ EXT. 260
	{  :-)
	{ 
	{ 
	{ 	-----Original Message-----
	{ 	From:	lnuslad.tz1h77 at eds.com [SMTP:lnuslad.tz1h77 at eds.com]
	{ 	Sent:	Tuesday, November 09, 1999 1:45 PM
	{ 	To:	gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
	{ 	Subject:	Processor in 730
	{ 
	{ 
	{ 
	{ 	Does anybody know what derivitive of the 68hc11 was used in
the 730?
	{ 
	{ 
	{ 	Jeremy
	{ 	

	--
	Pat Ford                           email: pford at qnx.com
	QNX Software Systems, Ltd.           WWW: http://www.qnx.com
	(613) 591-0931      (voice)         mail: 175 Terence Matthews

	(613) 591-3579      (fax)                 Kanata, Ontario, Canada
K2M 1W8