additional thoughts...caddy-olds and the buick v6

Mike Swayze mswayze at truswood.com
Thu Nov 11 14:27:24 GMT 1999


Now I'm lost--can you point me at a book or paper so that this will make
more sense.
Mike


At 08:07 AM 11/11/1999 -0600, you wrote:
>Right on the money Shannen ,Your thinking what I was thinking of doing with
>the 4 cly coil paks, the  2 crank sensors 90 deg ,ref pulses, 1 coilpak
>master, 2nd coilpak slave   ect. I would batch fire the injectors so you
>wouldn't need a cam sensor. The north star system would of course work, but
>I thought we were looking for a cheap alternative. I have also wanted to try
>4 pickup coils 90 deg around the balancer ,each pickup feeding a 7 term HEI
>module. The HEI module would fire a coilpak. All controlled by the ECM,batch
>fire the injectors. The Ref pulses would need to be figured out. Interesting
>stuff.
> 
>Don
>                                                    
> 
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:	Shannen Durphey [SMTP:shannen at grolen.com]
>> Sent:	Wednesday, November 10, 1999 7:58 PM
>> To:	gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
>> Subject:	Re: additional thoughts...caddy-olds and the buick v6
>> 
>> Shannen Durphey wrote:
>> 
>> > > >
>> > Thinking out loud, please correct me....
>> > You'll need to have 2 crank sensors, offset 90 degrees around
>> > balancer, and tie module ref outputs together, but keep pulse from 1st
>> > module away from module 2, and vice-versa, and you definitely don't
>> > want to run it with SFI unless you can guarantee that module for cyls
>> > 8+5, 3+2 never sends ref. pulse first.  Didn't the caddy 4.1/4.5l and
>> > the Norstar have DIS?
>> > Shannen
>>  EST line needs to be seperated also, yes?  Signal from ECM to module
>> must be split up between the pair of modules.
>> Shannen
>



More information about the Gmecm mailing list