165 to late MAF

[Mark Romans]

Hi Bruce:  I am not giving up yet on looking at a Bosch (For Porsche 928)
maf that is supposed to be larger than the GM application.  You would not
have to use a translator, just re-scale the settings in the ecm.  It
shouldn't matter since the ecm uses LV8, not actual grams/sec for any
calculations.
It would be nice not to max out the MAF at less than 5000 rpm's!  Some guys
I have talked to max out the maf at 2500 rpm's!  (Jason!)
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Plecan <nacelp at bright.net>
To: gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu <gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
Date: Saturday, November 27, 1999 8:56 AM
Subject: Re: 165 to late MAF


>
>----- Original Message -----
>Subject: Re: 165 to late MAF
>
>Wow, we ain't there yet......
>No body jump the gun, and start ordering anything, price check fine....
>Grumpy
>   Just making sure...
>
>
>| This sounds great!  I put in a price request to Dal at Lambert Buick for
a
>| 1995 or equivalent MAF as well as the harness-side connector hood, will
>| pass the numbers along when they arrive.
>|
>| Hardware list also includes ducting and clamps, the OD of the newer MAF
is
>| *way* bigger than the Bosch LH unit so new ducting is in order.
>| Fortunately the LT1 uses same-size throttle body.
>|
>| -Kevin
>|
>| At 09:40 AM 11/27/99 -0500, you wrote:
>| >For a couple weeks now, I've been looking at making a "translator" for
>using
>| >the later MAFs on a 165/148..  Then K Kelly posted the freq of the newer
>| >MAFs, and their values.  The ECMGUY posted his hac and it has the MAF
>values
>| >from that
>| >MAF, and their tables.  If someone would show me the scalar math I'll
>| >workout the new tables.
>| >  Then, you won't be calibration limited as much as in the past.
>| >If someone sees an error in this please POST, what it is.
>| >This is just the code end.  The harware is the new MAF, and connector
>wiring
>| >at MAF changes.
>| >Grumpy
>| >
>| >
>|
>