165 to late MAF

[Bruce Plecan]

----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Romans <romans at pacbell.net>
To: <gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 1999 1:42 PM
Subject: Re: 165 to late MAF

Why Bosch?.  The stock MAF is 250 and the late MAF is 496.
That is way close enough that your not over the top (and if so it's too
close to count).
OK, on the scalars, then what does need changed?????.
Grumpy


| Hi Bruce:  I am not giving up yet on looking at a Bosch (For Porsche 928)
| maf that is supposed to be larger than the GM application.  You would not
| have to use a translator, just re-scale the settings in the ecm.  It
| shouldn't matter since the ecm uses LV8, not actual grams/sec for any
| calculations.
| It would be nice not to max out the MAF at less than 5000 rpm's!  Some
guys
| I have talked to max out the maf at 2500 rpm's!  (Jason!)
| Mark
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Bruce Plecan <nacelp at bright.net>
| To: gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu <gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
| Date: Saturday, November 27, 1999 8:56 AM
| Subject: Re: 165 to late MAF
|
|
| >
| >----- Original Message -----
| >Subject: Re: 165 to late MAF
| >
| >Wow, we ain't there yet......
| >No body jump the gun, and start ordering anything, price check fine....
| >Grumpy
| >   Just making sure...
| >
| >
| >| This sounds great!  I put in a price request to Dal at Lambert Buick
for
| a
| >| 1995 or equivalent MAF as well as the harness-side connector hood, will
| >| pass the numbers along when they arrive.
| >|
| >| Hardware list also includes ducting and clamps, the OD of the newer MAF
| is
| >| *way* bigger than the Bosch LH unit so new ducting is in order.
| >| Fortunately the LT1 uses same-size throttle body.
| >|
| >| -Kevin
| >|
| >| At 09:40 AM 11/27/99 -0500, you wrote:
| >| >For a couple weeks now, I've been looking at making a "translator" for
| >using
| >| >the later MAFs on a 165/148..  Then K Kelly posted the freq of the
newer
| >| >MAFs, and their values.  The ECMGUY posted his hac and it has the MAF
| >values
| >| >from that
| >| >MAF, and their tables.  If someone would show me the scalar math I'll
| >| >workout the new tables.
| >| >  Then, you won't be calibration limited as much as in the past.
| >| >If someone sees an error in this please POST, what it is.
| >| >This is just the code end.  The harware is the new MAF, and connector
| >wiring
| >| >at MAF changes.
| >| >Grumpy
| >| >
| >| >
| >|
| >
|