165 MAF troubles
Michael Davis
davis at mail.eecis.udel.edu
Tue Oct 12 20:48:02 GMT 1999
MAF sounds ok at idle..
Check your O2... Sounds like deja-vu all over again.. 8-)
Have you put a scanner on it?
mike
In message <Pine.SOL.4.02.9910121544140.20617-100000 at gate.engin.umich.edu>,Dani
el Joseph Kunnath II writes:
>
> Hey all,
>
>
> This is the lowdown on what I need help with. My Bosch hot-wire
>MAF for an 89 L98 Camaro is acting up. Well really, the engine is acting
>up and I suspected the MAF was the culprit. Where I really have trouble
>is during cold start-up. The engine will stall and I can't get it to idel
>properly. I adjusted the TPS and replaced the IAC valve, but that didn't
>do the trick. I then took my old voltmeter to the MAF and checked it out.
>When the harness is unplugged out of the MAF and the ignition is on, I get
>12V from the power relay (correct) and I get 5V from the MAF sensor input
>(correct). The kicker is when I plug the harness into the MAF. After I
>power up the MAF, I measure 2.2V at both the computer and the MAF. When
>the engine is idling with the MAF connected, I get 0.4V at idle (correct),
>but the thing pegs out at near 2.2V @ 4500rpm. According to everything
>I've ever seen, engine off ignition on should be 5V and engine on should
>go from about 0.4V at idle to near 5V at WOT. With the low redline of the
>TPI engines, I'd imagine that I should be pulling near 5V @ 4500-5000rpm.
>
> The engine will run with the MAF connected, and it idles steady
>even during the old broomstick test. I can't figure out where the problem
>lies...could it by the sensor grounds? I can't find enough information on
>the insides of this MAF to dig into it. I don't want to spend the ~$400
>for a new one either if I can help it. I'd like to swap another in to see
>what happens, so possibly would one of you who are doing the MAF->MAP swap
>like to get rid of your working MAFs?
>
> Any insight is appreciated. I've had this problem ongoing for
>weeks now and I want to get it resolved. I got to get back out on the
>road!
>
> Thanks,
>
> DK
>
>
More information about the Gmecm
mailing list