MAF vs. SD

[CSH-HQ]

The more I talk to folks the more it seems that what runs best for them is 
what they are most familiar with..  Some of ht folks around here will talk 
MAF, and some SD as being best.  I've played with both, read all the 
comments in te archives numerous times, and at any one given moment argue 
one is better than the other.
  Me, personnally, I like SD.  I've done a bunch of 747 chips, and well 
since I base everything on past experience, well, that's where "I'm coming 
from".
  That and again the diacom for the 730 is a wonderful tuning aid.
Grumpy

>Thanks for all the replies about what to do for a VSS.... seems I've got
>plenty of solutions now.   Big question now is still do I keep the '165 and
>stay MAF, or try and get a '730 and go SD.
>
>>From what I've read so far, SD seems to be more tuned to the exact
>application so it would reason that I'd be better off with MAF since the VE
>of my motor is probably nothing like a Chevy motor, much less my
>displacement is higher and my intake volume/config is nothing like a TPI.
>
>Also, is the current cal I have VATS?   ('89 165, APYU cal)
>
>Is there a problem bypassing the heater connections on the IAC body on a
>TPI throttle body?   This installation's pretty ugly as it is.... if I can
>leave that off it would make life easier.   
>
>
>--> Bob Valentine
>--> bob at tecmark.com
>