When asking ecm questions

[CSH-HQ]

>
>It is speed density, but the VE tables are VERY poorly calibrated in
>stock form, like higher VE's at 60 kPA MAP than at 100 KPA in some
>places!

I've had to flat line the VE from 60-100 in some N/A to have enough fuel for 
a loose converter, light car, with the 700r4 with that dumb 3.06 1st gear.
They might have done it to try and light the turbo off quicker (depending on 
what they did with the timing).
Jus some ideas.

  There is also an error in the fuel algorithm in the stock chip.
>With the stock cal, the car tends to stall often.

GM in error, hmm, <g>.
>
>Fix some of the problems, and the car runs very well.  ;-)  I am working
>on cals for bigger injectors, a 3-bar MAP, a custom scan tool, etc.

If you go P+H, might figure out what moves, and use a 749, I lost the TCC 
when running 730 code in a 749, HTH
Grumpy
>
>I wrote some "auto-learn" code for the VE tables.  It will fill in a 
>new 16x16 VE table with corrected VE values.  The code is not installed
>yet (has been re-assembled), and it ought to be interesting if it works.
>The routine is so simple, I may post a code snippet, (if it works).
>
>
>Scot Sealander
>