More Questions. now on 94 p/u

[Mike Rolica]

Can run 87 octane, combustion chambers are debured, also has them swirl type
heads.  Not a problem with detonation, overheating ect.  Doesn't even seem
like ECM is retarding timing due to it (should feel a good loss of power)
When hauling the old man always uses 90-91 octane anyhow.  My tpi I run
11.33:1 on 89 no problem.   
BTW you gas is cheaper down there anyways:-)
Mike Rolica
EXT. 260
 :-)


	-----Original Message-----
	From:	DC Smith [SMTP:morepoweral at tetranet.net]
	Sent:	Monday, October 25, 1999 8:29 PM
	To:	gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
	Subject:	Re: More Questions. now on 94 p/u

	I hate to say it Mike, but no way would I ever build a cross country
	hauler at 10:1 CR. Finding good 93 octane fuel can be a hassle. I'd
be
	lerry of that on a vehicle I only drove around here. Let alone
something
	that's haulin a whole lotta "love" to Denver and back. :)
	 On that truck, I would have gone back stock on everything (mebbe a
few
	tweaks). Not a problem with fuel then.
	 Just my .02mV

	Mike Rolica wrote:
	> 
	> Yep,  10 cows, 1 bull.   Cow  1500- 2800lbs, bull 3200 pounds, you
do the
	> math.  2-1/2 not necessary, Is a gooseneck like fifth wheel, twin
axle
	> trailer.  Also probably reason why motor all wore out.
	> Mike Rolica
	> EXT. 260
	>  :-)

	
***********************************************************************
	Dan Smith      84 Regal   11.841 at 115.09     GSCA# 1459
	St.Charles, Missouri 
	mailto:morepoweral at tetranet.net               
	http://www.tetranet.net/users/morepoweral
	
***********************************************************************