X-fire

Ken Kelly ken73 at houston.rr.com
Fri Jan 7 04:39:03 GMT 2000


That's what I'm in the process of doing; replacing the '5550 with the '7747,
but I'm trying to figure out all the pinouts.

Actually, out of curiosity, what *is* better about the '7747, besides being
the most fully-hacked ECM (and having a free editor for it?) Is it faster?
Better drivers? Is the coding better/faster, or are there more options?

Also, What is IAT? (Sorry for my ignorance.)

Ken Kelly (#2)

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gmecm at esl.eng.ohio-state.edu
[mailto:owner-gmecm at esl.eng.ohio-state.edu]On Behalf Of Bruce Plecan
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 10:12 PM
To: gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
Subject: Re: X-fire



Just a peanut gallery comment, but why not save this energy toward doing a
747, conversion.  It's hac'd and there's a free editor for it.
  Sorry, but I don't undersand the fasination for that ecm.  Even if
original there is just so much to hac on it.  It's generally legal to update
to newer emission equipment, thou this issa truck, hmm, if you want legal
then go 1227748, and that uses a IAT.  I think someone around here did is
working on that, or maybe Terry K has an editor for it.
  Just trying to say you repeating what I've done.  The 747 is just so much
better, IMHO
Grumpy

| >Shannen,
| >I've got a factory manual for an 83 X-fire if you need any info (If it's
| >diff to 82).
| >Ross Myers
| Ross,
| Please post it somewhere! I'd like to get all the CrossFire info I can
| together in one place. I will scan my 1982 Vette wiring diagram for my
| CrossFire as well.
| Ken Kelly (#2)





More information about the Gmecm mailing list