V-Maf Differences for Part #s

Dave Zug dzug at delanet.com
Sun Jan 30 18:58:20 GMT 2000


well with no info contrary to that (that they are the same) I'll go with
that for mow but something tells me...


thanks.

Forgot about the burnoff wart. thats right.


----- Original Message -----
From: Gabe <gellett at earthlink.net>
To: <gmecm at diy-efi.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2000 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: V-Maf Differences for Part #s


> I have an (originally) '85 TPI in my truck.  I thought I was having MAF
troubles
> and got an '86 MAF from the salvage yard.  It seems to work/look the same.
I am
> now running an '165 instead of the '870 with the ARAP calibration.
>
> The '870 itself has no burnoff function, but it does have a "piggyback
module"
> that does conduct a burnoff to the MAF.  The 5 inputs/outputs are wired
and
> function the same between the MAF's.  I didn't realize that there was any
> difference at all.
>
> Is the '86 MAF the same as the '89?
>
> Dave Zug wrote:
>
> > I have seen a 85 MAF put onto an 89 '165 TPI system with no apparent ill
> > effects and was wondering just what the differences might be. the 89 may
be
> > higher quality components or a more enhanced range or something?  I know
the
> > 85 '870 used no burn off relay but when the 85 MAF is put on an 89
system
> > the burn off functions correctly and has not harmed it.  It led me to
ask
> > just what exactly are the changes between the early V-MAFS and the later
> > ones.  a curiosity thing - also it would be nice to know that if I see a
MAF
> > on an 85 '870 car I can snag it from a yard or parts car.
> >
> > anyone else?  anyone ever made a voltage-to-G/S graph from flow data for
ANY
> > MAF?
> >
> > > | There are differences in MAF part numbers between my 89 (voltage
type)
> > and
> > > | say an 85 (voltate type) MAF.
> > >
> > > Yep.
> > >
> > > | Can someone tell me what the differences may be, generally?
> > >
> > > Assuming your taking about your F-body, it is also a different ecm.
86-89
> > > take a 165.
> > > Bruce
> > >
> > > | Is it the curve? the range slightly? significantly??
> > > | no differences in the bore, and not the connector that I can tell.
> > > | thx.
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> > To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
> > in the body of a message (not the subject) to
majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
> in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org




More information about the Gmecm mailing list