165 MAF computer

[D]

Gotta agree Bruce the scanner stuff is slow and lacking thats why I use the
later code $5A as it is for higher bauld rate  and has lean cruise but will
go into the 165
If the 730 is plentiful (its not here - anyone care to send me a couple to
play with ?) then that would be a better option since it is hacked

There are other scanning software for the $5D but like you said it is slow.

Daniel

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce" <nacelp at bright.net>
To: <gmecm at diy-efi.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: 165 MAF computer


>
> The only scanner stuff I ever saw for it (5D) was the Holden Diacom, and
it
> was completely lacking in my opinion.  With no injector PW display, my
> opinion was why bother.
> With the release of a hac for the 730, it's got everything else beat hands
> down, from what I see
> Bruce
>    The Black Car is Running, oh is it ever.
>
>
> From: "D" <bossute at iprimus.com.au>
> Subject: Re: 165 MAF computer
> > I have done a few and it has always improved horsepower and
drivability -
> > more likely to be due to getting the tune "more right" than to a actual
> MAF
> > restriction.
> > Very easy wiring conversion with only having to move a few wires.
> > I am surprised that more people haven't tried the $5D  code in the 165
> > computer to run a MAP sensor - only down side is the low speed data
> although
> > there is a way around that if you use the later $5A which runs at the
> higher
> > rate (not yet fully hacked yet though ).
> > Daniel Collins
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
> in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org