89 F-body ECU file = 89 Y-body ECU file?

[Michael Davis]

Don't be so fast to suggest unless you've gotten further emperical
data to support it...  Though I don't claim to have a fully tuned
'730 bin file yet, I tested the '730 and '165 systems head to head
last weekend at the track and the '165 was constitantly 0.1 second
faster in the 1/4 mile on my car..  (Est. 400 gross HP)

(I have built an adaptor cable that routes the '165 OEM harness to a
 '730, and my car is equiped with both MAP and MAF sensors and dual
 knock sensors...
	http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~davis/z28/ecm_swap_730/ 
)

Quarter-mile runs with the car, each about 15 minutes after one another..

	1 (MAP) 13.098 at 105      (let car shift to OD)
	2 (MAP) 13.095 at 105      (let car shift to OD)
	 3 (MAF) 12.941 at 105      (kept car in 3rd to 5600rpm)
	 4 (MAF) 13.071 at 103      (let car shift to OD)
	 5 (MAF) 12.927 at 106      (kept car in 3rd to 5800rpm)
	6 (MAP) 13.063 at 105      (kept car in 3rd to 5800rpm)
	7 (MAP) 13.050 at 105      (kept car in 3rd to 5900rpm)

		
In message <01BF8A80.695CCE40 at amy-and-mike>,Mike rolica writes:
>
>Been there and done that.  The 89 f body and vette 165 bins are not laid =
>out the same.  I think1 or 2 tables are but thats about it.  Want some =
>real improvement... swap to a 730.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org