Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)

[Bruce Plecan]

396 is going to use alot of air,
the MAF only will measure 250 grams / sec.,  once you peg the MAF your out
of calibration data, and just using the same data from 250g/sec to 35 or
what ever you do flow.
   I see no problems other then changing from 2 to 3 ecm connnectors.
Bruce



> Really?  Isn't a bigger headache to switch to a 730?  Maybe I am a bit
naive
> but it seems that 165 MAF ecm is fairly simple.  Right now my goal is to
get
> it close and not perfect.  Since I know nothing about speed density, I
plan
> to stick with the MAF.
>
> Jason Norris
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bruce Plecan" <nacelp at bright.net>
> To: <gmecm at diy-efi.org>
> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 1:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of
255)
>
>
> >
> > Avoid the headache, switch to a 730.
> > IMO.
> > Unless your switching over to a late model pcm, with a 3.5" MAF
> > Bruce
> >
> >
> > > Please let me know what you find out since I have an 89 Corvette that
I
> am
> > > building a 396 for with a Super Ram.
> > > Jason Norris
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
> > in the body of a message (not the subject) to
majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
> in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org