700r4 Trans

Guenther, Max [ASCO/PA] Mguenther at ASCO.COM
Thu Jan 4 19:19:21 GMT 2001


I thought(this always caused trouble) the 200 was not as beefy as the 700?
Whats the difference between the two?  I guess its not 500hp;-)?
Max

> ----------
> From: 	Bruce Plecan[SMTP:nacelp at bright.net]
> Reply To: 	gmecm at diy-efi.org
> Sent: 	Thursday, January 04, 2001 1:22 PM
> To: 	gmecm at diy-efi.org
> Subject: 	Re: 700r4 Trans
> 
> 
> Since the later vettes came with a 700, I'd imagine there are alot of bits
> to make this a bolt in.
> One thing I'd recommend doing is thinking about a 200R4.  The 700 has a
> real
> short first gear (3.06), and the 200 is more in the 2.7 range, so it's
> more
> of a close ratio tranny.   If you use a GN, or late Monte, you'll get the
> right valve body for a HiPo tranny.  I've had both, and the 200 is the
> better in my opinion.  Again, not talking racing.  Just civilized spirited
> driving <g>..
> Bruce
> 
> 
> 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org




More information about the Gmecm mailing list